Supporting and celebrating global linguistic diversity
Classification: Sino-Tibetan
·vulnerable
The lexical similarity between the two Pangkhua wordlists is 88%, which indicates there is not substantial difference within the Pangkhua language, especially considering that these two Pangkhua villages are far apart and that speakers from these two villages are far apart and that speakers from these two villages do not have regular contact with each other.
http://www-01.sil.org/SILESR/2011/silesr2011-025.pdf |
|
Amy Kim, Palash Roy, Mridul Sangma |
|
SIL International |
Charles Häberl 3518 days ago
Photo not found -- try hosting it on picasaweb.google.com!
This image is hosted on Picasa. If you believe this image violates Picasa's Community Standards please click on the image; then click on the report photo link in the options menu at the bottom right of the screen. From here you can report the image for review by the Picasa Team.
Please note this content report will be publicly associated with your Endangered Languages Project username and shared with third party volunteer moderators for their review against our Content Guidelines.